Introduction to Software Architecture Patterns
Introduction
The capacity of software to grow and satisfy users’ requests over time is greatly influenced by its architectural design. This article discusses many software architecture patterns, their significance, and comparative analysis to aid in your decision-making. Any software flaws have a substantial effect on an organization’s business. The choice of incorrect software architecture patterns can be the primary cause of any software failure. However, armed with prior knowledge, you might direct programmers and designers in creating the components and their reactions.
It is common for businesses to begin the application development process without a formal architecture in place. They frequently overlook the possibility that the lack of an architectural pattern can force the producing team to choose a conventional pattern with no rules. They eventually produce codes that are unclear regarding duties, obligations, and interpersonal connections.
For instance, a complicated architecture like the microservices design would not be necessary for an online banking application. For fetching queries, it can be easily constructed utilizing client-server architecture. However, without this planning, the application can be complicated, leaving no room for error or risking a significant loss on the restructuring process’ expenditure. Planning an architecture pattern aids in risk analysis and prevents any negative effects on the business.
Let’s examine software architectural patterns and fully explain some of their types so that we have a thorough knowledge.
What is an architectural pattern?
An outline that enables you to articulate and establish a structural schema for all types of software systems is what is known as an architectural pattern. It is a reusable solution that offers a set of established subsystems, roles, and responsibilities, together with the guidelines and a roadmap for creating their interrelationships. It assists you in dealing with a variety of software engineering issues, including performance restrictions, high availability, reducing business risk, etc.
An architectural pattern is not your system’s true architecture, despite being a rough representation or blueprint of it. Instead, it’s a theory that clarifies the components of software architecture. The same pattern may be used in innumerable different architectural designs. The success of the system depends on the choice of software architecture, which is why patterns are regarded as “strictly stated and commonly utilized”. The MVC pattern, MVVM, microkernel, n-tier, domain-driven design components, message bus, service requester/consumer, and presentation-abstraction-control are popular architectural pattern examples.
Examples of different types of software architecture patterns.
Next, we will discuss different types of software architecture patterns. Mainly we will discuss nine software patterns in this article.
- The pattern of Layered Architecture
Most likely, you’ve heard of multi-layered, also known as tiered or n-tier architecture. This architecture has become more and more popular among designers and software architects due to its similarities to the traditional IT communication setups seen in many startups and large corporations. The four layers of a layered architecture are frequently categorized as presentation, business, persistence, and database. However, the pattern is not limited to these layers and can also include an application layer, service layer, or data access layer. This architectural paradigm was used by well-known frameworks like Java EE.
Consider a scenario in which a software engineer is creating a sizable application and finds themselves using all four tiers of their architecture pattern. On the other hand, small organizations might integrate the business and persistence layers into a single entity, especially if the latter is used as a crucial component of the business logic layer.
Each layer in this architecture is separate within the program and is designated as closed, which makes it stand out. It indicates that in order to move on to the layer below it, a request must first travel through that layer. Ones of isolation, another of its ideas, lets you change components within one layer without affecting those in other layers.
Let’s use an example of an eCommerce web application to illustrate this approach. The presentation tier receives the business logic straight from the application tier in order to process a shopping cart activity, such as calculating the cart. The application tier serves in this case as an integration layer to create frictionless communication between the data and presentation layers. The data tier, which is the final tier, is also used to maintain data independently of the application server and business logic. Usage:
2. Pattern for Event-driven Architecture
An event-driven architecture pattern is the best choice if you want a flexible and highly effective architecture design. Its separate, specialized event processing components receive and process events asynchronously. This pattern controls how people behave in relation to the events’ production, detection, and consumption as well as the reactions they elicit.
The mediator and broker topologies are the two that make up the event-driven architectural approach. When several processes need to be coordinated within an event bus through a central mediator, a mediator is utilized. On the other side, a broker is utilized to connect events decentralized mediator-free. An e-commerce website is a nice illustration of event-driven architecture in use. The e-commerce website can respond to several sources at a moment of heavy demand thanks to the event-driven design. It simultaneously prevents any application crashes and resources over provisioning
3. Pattern for Microkernel Architecture
A core system and multiple plug-in modules make up the two sorts of components that make up this architecture pattern. While the plug-in modules are autonomous components with specialized processing, the core system just needs to function at the bare minimum to keep the system running.
From the viewpoint of a business application, the core system can be described as broad business logic devoid of any specialized code for unique circumstances, unique rules, or intricate conditional procedures. The plug-in modules, on the other hand, are designed to improve the core system and add new business capabilities. Using a task scheduler application as an example, the microkernel houses all the logic for triggering and scheduling tasks, while the plug-ins house the individual tasks. The microkernel can activate plug-ins without being aware of the implementation specifics as long as they follow a predetermined API.
4. Pattern for Microservices Architecture
Monolithic applications and service-oriented architectures are viewed as strong competitors to the microservices architecture paradigm. Through an efficient, streamlined delivery pipeline, the components are distributed separately. Enhanced scalability and a high level of decoupling within the application are two advantages of the approach.
A remote access protocol is used to access the components because of their disconnected and independent nature. Furthermore, the identical components can be created, implemented, and tested independently, independent of any other service component. One of the pioneers of the microservice architectural paradigm was Netflix. The engineering team was able to operate in small teams responsible for the complete creation of hundreds of microservices thanks to the architecture. Together, these microservices stream digital content to millions of Netflix subscribers.
5. Pattern for Space-Based Architecture
The name of this architecture is based on the idea of tuple space and distributed shared memory. Two main parts make up the space-based pattern: a processor unit and a virtualized middleware.
Parts of application components, including web-based components and backend business logic, are contained in the processing unit. While a single processing unit might be used to deploy a smaller web application, a larger application could divide the functionality among numerous processing units to prevent functional collapse. The virtualized middleware component also includes components that regulate several facets of data synchronization and request handling. They might be written specifically for you or you can buy third-party items. A good illustration of this architectural pattern would be a bidding auction website. It works by sending a browser request to the site, which then accepts bids from internet users. After receiving the request, the website changes the information with the most recent bid, saves the bid with a timestamp, and sends the data back to the browser.
6. Pattern of Client-Server Architecture
A distributed application structure with two primary components — a client and a server — is referred to as having a client-server architecture pattern. The communication between the client and server, which may or may not be connected to the same network, is made easier by this architecture. A client asks the server to collect certain resources, such as data, content, services, files, etc. from the server. When a request is made, the server recognizes it and responds to the client by sending the requested resources.
Programs that interact with one another within an application are an example of the functionality of a client and a server. As a single client can use several servers or a single server can serve multiple clients, this architecture’s functionality is quite versatile. Regardless of how well they function, servers can be categorized according to the resources or services they offer.
One well-known model created utilizing the client-server approach is email. When a user or client requests a certain email, the server examines its pool of resources and replies with the requested email resource. Additionally, this aids in enhancing user experience.
7. Pattern of Master-Slave Architecture
Consider a single database that is simultaneously flooded with a number of similar requests. Naturally, handling every request simultaneously could make the application process more difficult and take longer. A master-slave architectural pattern that works by the master database deploying numerous slave components to swiftly handle those requests offers a solution to this issue.
The master-slave architecture pattern can be visualized as a master assigning tasks to its slaves, as the word suggests. The distributed tasks are compiled by the master and presented as the result after the slave components have completed their tasks. It is important to remember that the master component, which determines the slave components’ communication and functional priorities, has total authority over them. This method differs from others in that each slave would process the requests concurrently and deliver the results simultaneously. This also implies that until all slaves had given the master their results, the slave activities will not be deemed finished.
For apps that can be broken into smaller chunks for carrying out similar requests, this design pattern works effectively. An appropriate example would be a database application, which is crucially dependent on heavy multitasking.
8. Pattern for Pipe-Filter Architecture
In a pipe-filter architecture pattern, components are referred to as filters and pipes are the elements that connect these filters, processing a stream of data in a unidirectional flow. The pipelines send data to the filters, and the output of one filter becomes the input for the next filter in the chain of data processing. This architecture’s purpose is to divide important parts or processes into separate, numerous parts that can all be processed at once.
The pipe-filter architecture is best suited for applications that can generate simple sequences to complicated structures and process data in a stream using web services. Since each filter in a compiler performs lexical analysis, parsing, semantic analysis, and other functions, compilers are a good example of an architecture that follows this pattern.
9. Pattern for Broker Architecture
For constructing distributed systems with uncoupled components, a broker pattern is utilized. Components can communicate with one another in broker architecture patterns by calling remote services. The broker is also in charge of all component coordination and communication.
The three main parts of the broker pattern are clients, servers, and brokers. A broker often has access to all the features and services associated with a specific server. When clients ask the broker for a service, the broker directs them to the appropriate service category for further action. This architecture pattern’s ability to handle activities like change, addition, deletion, or relocation connected to objects in a dynamic way is one of its main advantages. Last but not least, this architectural design separates all communication-related code from the application into layers, enabling programs to execute on dispersed or solitary machines. Broker architecture is common because of these benefits.
Reference:
Bug Zero is a bug bounty, crowdsourcing platform for security testing. The platform is the intermediatory entity that enables client organizations to publish their service endpoints so that bug hunters (security researchers / ethical hackers) registered in the platform can start testing the endpoints without any upfront charge. Bug hunters can start testing as soon as a client organization publishes a new program. Bug Zero also offers private bug bounty programs for organizations with high-security requirements.
Bug Zero is available for both hackers and organizations.
For organizations and hackers, register with Bug Zero for free, and let’s make cyberspace safe.
